|
Post by Football Buddah on Jun 6, 2008 21:12:04 GMT -5
Since the last poll was 11-2 in favor of a SCORING change (over a lineup change), I have come up with a few suggestions:
This is the current scoring: Fumble Recovery = 4 points each Forced Fumble = 4 points each Interception = 4 points each Def TDs = 5 points each QB Sack = 2 points for every 1/2 sack (4 for a solo sack) Assists = 1 point for every 2 Assists Tackles = 3 points for every 2 Tackles
Based on the above scoring, the positon breakdown for IDP's is as follows: TOP 100 (IDP's) DL 12 LB 55 DB 33
TOP 50 (IDP's) DL 6 LB 39 DB 5
TOP 25 (IDP's) DL 1 LB 23 DB 1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here are my suggestions for a scoring change:
OPTION 1 - For LB's only, reduce tackles to 1 pt per tackle while leaving the DL's and DB's at 3 pts per 2 tackles.
Tackles (LB) = 1 point for every 1 Tackle Tackles (DL / DB) = 3 points for every 2 Tackles
Based on this option, the positon breakdown for IDP's would be as follows: TOP 100 (IDP's) DL 16 LB 44 DB 40
TOP 50 (IDP's) DL 9 LB 27 DB 14
TOP 25 (IDP's) DL 6 LB 13 DB 6
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OPTION 2 - For DL's and DB's, increase tackles to 2 pts per tackle, while leaving the LB's at 3 pts per 2 tackles.
Tackles (LB) = 3 points for every 2 Tackles Tackles (DL / DB) = 2 points for every 1 Tackles
Based on this option, the positon breakdown for IDP's would be as follows: TOP 100 (IDP's) DL 18 LB 35 DB 47
TOP 50 (IDP's) DL 8 LB 15 DB 27
TOP 25 (IDP's) DL 5 LB 7 DB 13
If anybody has any other options and you would like to see the results, please let me know your ideas and I will run the numbers on our site to see how they pan out.
|
|
|
Post by JagerBombs on Jun 10, 2008 0:56:45 GMT -5
Not sure if you are putting up a poll for this but I would vote for Option 2. I already think IDP scoring is not near on par with offensive players, so decreasing it further would put it even more out of whack. Your numbers are a bit misleading as you state top 100 - but that is really top 100 IDP players. I would like to see top 100 when you include offensive players.
|
|
|
Post by Football Buddah on Jun 10, 2008 19:16:01 GMT -5
Here are the Top 100 (overall) - based on the scoring options listed above:
Option 1: TOP 100 QB 17 RB 19 WR 27 TE 4 PK 0 DEF 22 DL 3 LB 5 DB 3 TOP 50 QB 14 RB 10 WR 16 TE 3 PK 0 DEF 6 DL 0 LB 1 DB 0 TOP 25 QB 10 RB 5 WR 10 TE 0 PK 0 DEF 0 DL 0 LB 0 DB 0
Option 2: TOP 100 QB 16 RB 13 WR 20 TE 4 PK 0 DEF 13 DL 6 LB 11 DB 17 TOP 50 QB 13 RB 10 WR 14 TE 2 PK 0 DEF 5 DL 0 LB 2 DB 4 TOP 25 QB 10 RB 4 WR 10 TE 0 PK 0 DEF 0 DL 0 LB 1 DB 0
I will be posting a poll shortly. I was waiting to see if there were any other suggestions on scoring changes/options.
|
|
|
Post by JagerBombs on Jun 11, 2008 10:12:22 GMT -5
Option 2 looks much more balanced. Thanks for the extra information
|
|
|
Post by Wonderlickers on Jun 12, 2008 22:17:43 GMT -5
Option 2 (The Deuce) also looks good to me.
|
|